Sweethearts Candy Blog's

From the Washington Times, via Blazing Cat Fur:

A panel of national security experts who worked under Republican and Democratic presidents is urging the Obama administration to abandon its stance that Islam is not linked to terrorism, arguing that radical Muslims are using Islamic law to subvert the United States.

The study group, sponsored by the conservative-oriented Center for Security Policy, says in its report that proponents of advancing Islamic law mark the "crucial fault line" in Islam's internal divisions separating truly moderate Muslims, like the late Indonesian President Abdurrahman Wahid, from the large portion of the world's 1 billion Muslims who advocate imposing what they call Shariah law throughout the world.

According to the report, proponents of Shariah are "Muslim supremacists" waging "civilization jihad" along with the Islamist terrorists engaged in violent jihad, like al Qaeda.

Blazing Cat Fur has more links here.

Cartoon Hat Tip:  Sultan Knish

There are a lot of Dhimmi Dimwits who have appointed themselves Enforcers of Sharia Law.  Those who condemn protests of Islam and all of its attendant, gory violence, fall into this category.

Turn on the news and hear any newscaster discussing the spate of recent Koran burnings.  The newscaster will be speaking in his "Oh-ain't-it-awful" voice, as if he or she can barely suppress his outrage.  They will proudly intone that their station REFUSES to show any Koran burnings on camera, as if their high-mindedness was a badge of honor.  Actually, it's a badge of cowardice, indicating they are terrified of being killed by Muslim Jihadis for showing it.

The Dhimmitude associated with Islamization has already begun in the United States.  Meanwhile, we have media types, politicians, priests and even conservative bloggers running interference for Islam.

They may not know it, but they have become similar to the Jewish Kapos of the concentration camps:   they identify with the enemy and enforce his rules against the others, in the hope of being spared the gas chambers.

That analogy isn't completely accurate in the here and now.  Our modern Kapos aren't afraid of the gas chamber; they may be somewhat afraid of being targeted by violent Muslims, but there are greater reasons for their attitudes.   Our modern Dhimmi Enforcers of Sharia constantly defend Islam for these reasons:

1. They are ignorant of the nature, history, teachings and practices of Islam, i.e. that the religion is violent and totalitarian with a desire to rule the world.
2. They are hoping to escape the usual smears of the Democratic Party, e.g., that they are "racists" for opposing tyranny, or bigots for opposing "just another" religion, no matter how violent.
3. They are looking for public approval and admiration for being broad-minded, tolerant and enlightened (i.e., moral posturing).
4. They believe such demonstrations are necessary to get their candidates elected.

So the next time you criticize someone for criticizing or protesting Islam, think.  Do you really want to be the Saudi Religious Police in America?  An enforcer of Sharia law in the United States?  Because that is what you are actually doing.